

The interest received by the loss entity (i.e.This would result in the following (assuming both companies have the same taxable income year-on-year): So he comes up with the following scheme: the loss entity will lend the profit entity an amount of € 2.000 with an interest rate of 50%. Let’s say, the shareholder isn’t too eager to report a profit of € 1.000 in the tax return of the profit entity. ~ € 250 corporate income tax), while the loss entity reports a loss, which can be offset against future profits. This will result in the profit entity reporting a taxable profit of €1.000 (i.e. The Dutch CIT act does however consider each entity to be subject to CIT on a stand-alone basis. From a shareholders perspective, it is quite understandable to think that the group as a whole will not have to report any corporate income tax. One of these entities reports a profit of € 1.000 (the profit entity), whilst the other reports a loss of € 1.000 (the loss entity).
#TRANSFER PRICING TAX PROFESSIONAL#
No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.įor more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 2, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.Imagine the following scenario: you are the 100% shareholder of two entities. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. KPMG International Limited is a private English company limited by guarantee and does not provide services to clients.
#TRANSFER PRICING TAX LICENSE#
The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organization. Read a March 2023 report* prepared by KPMG LLP that focuses on the role of transfer pricing in responsible tax practices and sets forth suggestions of what MNCs may need to be doing going forward in terms of tax transparency and transfer pricing. Consider if there are ways to proactively engage with tax authorities to show a commitment to a sustainable approach to tax.Create robust mechanisms to ensure compliance with their tax and transfer pricing policies.Make their tax strategy publicly available.Include their approach to transfer pricing in their tax strategy.Work with their business to develop a tax strategy that aligns with their overall business strategy.In the next few years, as stakeholders become more engaged on ESG and tax, five critical initial steps for tax departments are: An MNC can address these pressures by drafting a publicly available, groupwide tax policy that sets forth their approach toward key aspects of taxation, including their approach to transfer pricing. This area will continue to be a focus of internal stakeholders (for example, employees, managers, and owners) and external stakeholders (for example, governments, NGOs, and rating agencies).Īs part of that focus, stakeholders are increasingly expressing an interest in understanding the MNC’s approach to tax and transfer pricing.

Over the last several years, multinational corporations (MNCs) have faced strong encouragement from governments and regional bodies (like the European Commission), nongovernmental organizations, and lobbyist organizations to embrace responsible governance as part of their environmental, social, and governance (ESG) journey.
